We all know about the missile defense of Russia and the USA.

Greeting the readers of the channel!

It is very important if you give your voice in a survey below. It helps in the development of the channel.

Nowadays, it is relevant to know the answer to the question set in the title of the article. The situation in the world is glowing and the availability of a workable system of anti-missile defense is more than ever. After the collapse of the USSR, our country has lost a unified system of pro. Fortunately, over the past 20 years, Russia has managed to restore a single missile defense system and radar field.

Of course, the same system has the same system from our potential opponent of the United States of America. It is clear that the systems about Russia and the United States differ from each other. Today I will try to explain what their principled difference.

It is known that in 2016 Russia completed the deployment of the first queue of the early warning system of a rocket attack, which has a brief name of SPRN. The principle of operation of the Russian SPRN is that the satellites in the orbit of Earth first detect the start of ballistic missiles. Then, ground stations of early warning on a rocket attack begin to work. These include such stations as «Daryal», «Dnipro» and «Voronezh».

These stations begin to calculate the trajectory of ballistic missiles and the direction of their impact. After that, the radar «Don-2n», which is located near Moscow — processes this data and guides anti-missile systems. In general, the radar radius of Russian SPRN is 6 thousand kilometers.

To solve the problem with the creation of a unified system of the Russian system about our scientists, RRS «Voronezh-M» and «Voronezh-DM», respectively, meter and decimeter ranges were developed. In general, these radars are the first in the world that have a modular design and are assembled from blocks produced at the factories. Thanks to this, they are erected over a year and a half, although they were built to 10 years in Soviet times.

The newest RLSs are installed in all directions along the borders of Russia: in Kaliningrad, Irkutsk, Leningrad, Orenburg regions, Krasnodar, Krasnoyarsk and Altai Territories. There are plans for the installation of these radar in Vorkuta, Murmansk, the Republic of Komi and in Sevastopol. In terms of early warning about a rocket attack, Russia is reliably protected.

But what about the USA? In general, the United States has only one radar station of anti-missile defense, which more or less corresponds to the indicators of the Russian radar «Voronezh-DM». This station is located in Greenland. Other American radars, significantly inferior to Russian, are located on Alaska and California. These stations have basic mine-based missile systems.

Another class of the American RLS system and anti-missiles are located in Europe: in Romania and placed accommodation in Poland. In the Asian region, the United States has batteries of anti-missiles with radar on warships, as well as data that they will be installed in South Korea.

The main difference about Russia and the United States from each other is that our system relies on the radar mounted on land. The American system is based on the fact that it depends on space satellites, thanks to which the defects of ballistic missiles are detected.

In the end, I would like to say that Russian SPRN is many times better than an American system because it does not depend so critically from military satellites. Moreover, satellites must be periodically reduced from orbits and replaced with new ones, since their resource is not eternal. Russian radars — can stand for long decades without serious replacement equipment.

And in general, satellites can be destroyed by electromagnetic radiation and in the end, the US radar system simply will not. That is, there are enough nuclear bombs to deal with US military satellites and the United States will remain without a nuclear umbrella.

And today everything. Thank you for reading to the end. We are waiting for your reading of our new articles.